Red Dot Sights and Pistols: A Data Driven Approach

Everyone loves red dot sights, and they are becoming massively popular on pistols. There’s just one problem with that, they aren’t any better than iron sights, for one particular group of shooters. Keep reading to see who should be using irons and who can definitely benefit from pistol mounted red dot sights.

Now before I get crazy emails from dudes named Larry who are about to “pop off,” let me explain my position on pistol mounted red dot sights.

Popping Off

I think they are the future aiming solution for pistols. They are rugged enough for duty/tactical use and they do help the vast majority of the population shoot more precisely, which is always a good thing.

This brings me to my previous assertion that they aren’t inherently the best aiming solution for everyone. While they do help many people shoot more accurately, they tend to cause novice and intermediate shooters to slow down their speed of engagement due to over aiming. They also do not help expert shooters shoot more accurately nor any faster.

It’s a bold claim I know, but I do have some data to back this up.

Pistol Mounted Red Dot Shooting Data

Just as in any scientific endeavor this article started off with a question, “Are pistol mounted red dot sights better than iron sights?” To answer this question I needed some data, and I couldn’t just rely on myself, or on or two other shooters. I needed a data set, but where would I get such information?

As it happens there is a very large data set with shooters of all levels who have shot standardized courses of fire, with iron sights, and with red dot sights.

The United States Practical Shooting Association has a classification system that has their shooters shoot standardized stages which will give them a classification of their current skill level.

[alpine-phototile-for-pinterest src=”board” uid=”jjackson6860″ board=”pistols” imgl=”pinterest” pinit=”1″ dlstyle=”medium” style=”wall” row=”4″ size=”554″ num=”8″ shadow=”1″ highlight=”1″ curve=”1″ max=”100″]

They also have several different divisions to shoot in. For this article we will be comparing scores of Production shooters (the least modified pistols), to Carry Optics (slide mounted red dots with the similar modifications).

If you are a member then you have access to their dozens of classifier descriptions and their calculator which lets you compare scores across different shooting divisions. This is exactly what I did.

Like shooting science, fitness, and pretending to be an operator when mom isn’t looking? Then click here to join the Tier Three Team. You’ll get all the latest articles sent directly to you, and thousands have already. 

The Comparison

I chose six different classifiers, and picked an arbitrary score, to compare those shooting pistol mounted red dots, vs a similar pistol with traditional iron sights.

See the chart below.

Red Dot Pistol Sights vs. Iron Sights
Higher Scores = less advantageous

You can see from the chart that every single classifier is the exact same, apart from El Presidente. El Prez actually favored iron sights as the same exact score gave you a higher classification in Carry Optics.

In other words, for two shooters shooting the exact same speed and accuracy you are ranked as less skilled in production, meaning production takes a better score to achieve the same rank.

It can be a bit complicated, but the overall results are clear. For very skilled shooters, who practice regularly there is no appreciable difference in speed or accuracy with red dot sights.

It should also be noted that I picked stages that tested many different shooting characteristics. Some were one handed, some were speed heavy, and some required extremely accurate shooting.

This is an example where I would have assumed that a dot would produce higher scores since the furthest targets are 105ft away, requiring a high accuracy component.


classifier USPSA 4 bill drill
Classifier: 4 Bill Drill

So that solves the issues right? Just throw those sights in the trash! Not exactly, they are extremely useful for the vast majority of shooters.

The Benefits of Red Dot Sights

Remember that these are scores for competitive pistol shooters. These guys and gals practice hours per week both live and dry fire. At the top end of the sport it’s fairly common for these shooters to shoot thousands of rounds per week and dry fire at least an hour a day. Needless to say this is not the average shooter you’ll find at your favorite range.

Check out this video of one of the top USPSA Carry Optics and Production shooters, Hwansik Kim.

Not your average joe at the range!

For the vast majority of shooters, the red dot sight is going to increase accuracy at most distances, and increase lethal hits on target. Check out this four year study by Sage Dynamics, that thoroughly compared red dots vs irons for shooters of all skill levels.

For those of you with ADHD they found that all shooters from novice to somewhat advanced shooters increased accuracy both in a standard shooting tests and in a force on force scenario.

Conclussions

Where does that leave us? Are red dot sights both better and worse than traditional irons? Unfortunately the answer is not that simple. For those that have thousands of rounds and hundreds of hours of practice on irons there doesn’t appear to be an appreciable advantage to a red dot sight.

Think about it this way. If I gave a professional race car driver a car with very good traction control is that going to help them? Probably not, they already know exactly what to do to extract maximum performance from the vehicle.

If you give that same car to someone who has no experience on a race track that traction control will be a life saver and will increase their performance.

Either way if you decide to adopt a red dot sight for your pistol you will need to spend a lot of time practicing with it until you feel just as comfortable with the dot as you do with the iron sights.

I highly recommend checking out Kyle Lamb’s book Stay in the Fight (Amazon Affiliate Link). It is an excellent guide to combat pistol shooting and if you can’t learn something from this Delta shooter, then you probably think blue crayons taste like berries.

Crayola Crayon Marine
True Fact!!!

Now get out there and start training!

Like this article? Then share it !

2 thoughts on “Red Dot Sights and Pistols: A Data Driven Approach”

  1. Jake,
    On the mark again. Cowan’s white paper makes the case that red dots are generally superior to iron sights, specifically for law enforcement for a number of logical and legal reasons. Does the same hold true for civilian CCW carriers? Maybe, maybe not. I guess if you want to be a face-shooter preparing to engage the chance encounter with a mall shooter or potential terrorist—go for it. Most, who can afford the hardware, do so to increase their ability to shoot more accurately than they probably could with iron sights for a variety of reasons, i.e., vision problems with accommodation for front sight focus. Moving to red dots may be a logical choice but does require deliberate practice, concentrated effort and time to retrain the brain to target focus as the default. The following is to share a few thoughts with readers of this fine blog about my personal progressive journey from one type of hardware and sighting mode to another that worked better for me and maybe what lies beyond.
    I have not personally switched to a red dot on my carry weapons…yet. Several years ago, I ditched my iron sights and switched to a target-focused sighting system called the Hexsite. This combat sighting system has been well studied (and vilified by some) as it challenged the prevailing heterodoxy. I know the inventor personally, and unfortunately due to illness, this sighting system is no longer available. (Documentation and info available for anyone interested.)
    I mention this only because, for me, the Hexsite was a step beyond the traditional iron sight (including the ubiquitous night sights) towards a target-focused approach to defensive shooting. A red dot sight on my carry gun is still an option, especially if my vision deteriorates. Early cataracts, astigmatism and a lifetime of wearing progressive lenses all contribute to not being able to make the three focal plane changes necessary to execute a defensive, accurate shot with iron sights. I’ve already retrained my brain to default to target focus (I also have a Hexsite on my dry fire SIRT) and can readily refocus vision for more precise shots when needed. I do have a red dot on my carbine and a target pistol, but moving to my EDC that potentially would be used for defense in the Wal Mart parking lot, car jacking or home invasion should be a seamless transition.
    Whatever sight choice you make, deliberate practice and dedicated training with that system should become your personal gold standard.
    Alan

    Reply

Leave a Comment

affiliate blonyx 10% web banner 728x90